
10/1/2004 c1 olivia
I completely agree with you! There is nothing worse in the whole world than a "flip-flopper"! I totally supported my sister, she got married to an abusive man, but if she left him, she'd be a worthless flip-flopper. My uncle too, is an alcoholic, but if he tried to give up drinking, he too would be a scum-of-the-earth-flip-flopper. Seriously. Wake up.
Ah, of course we should blme Kerry, because it was Kerry that was in control of this country for the past four years. Oh wait, that was Bush. Get a clue here. "Stupid guy" yeah, that's REAL descriptive and poetic. Hm...Soldiers being murderers? Of course not! It's not called "murder" when you kill thousands of people! Oh wait... Good luck in the future (you're going to need it if Bush steals another one...)
I completely agree with you! There is nothing worse in the whole world than a "flip-flopper"! I totally supported my sister, she got married to an abusive man, but if she left him, she'd be a worthless flip-flopper. My uncle too, is an alcoholic, but if he tried to give up drinking, he too would be a scum-of-the-earth-flip-flopper. Seriously. Wake up.
Ah, of course we should blme Kerry, because it was Kerry that was in control of this country for the past four years. Oh wait, that was Bush. Get a clue here. "Stupid guy" yeah, that's REAL descriptive and poetic. Hm...Soldiers being murderers? Of course not! It's not called "murder" when you kill thousands of people! Oh wait... Good luck in the future (you're going to need it if Bush steals another one...)
9/29/2004 c1
1Just a lonely aspiring author
This is such a brilliant peice of work! I'm tired of people insulting Bush because he went to war with Iraq, and about the oil thing... It made alot more sense to go after Iraq than Afghanistan, since, in case someone in the room didn't notice, Afhganistan has already been liberated. Bush helped save countless Iraqi lives by dethroning Hussein. Do you know what Saddam's favorite form of murdering his own people was? He'd make them chug gasoline, and then shoot them, and flame them. The people in Iraq would be much worse off if not for the war. Sure, Kerry claims to eventually do all these "wonderful" things, yet he doesn't explain HOW he will do it. And in case you Kerry supporters are unable to read summaries, the summary said "Not for Democrats" So why the hell did you read it! Don't wory Xanthexanthias, (Or however you spell it) I got your back

This is such a brilliant peice of work! I'm tired of people insulting Bush because he went to war with Iraq, and about the oil thing... It made alot more sense to go after Iraq than Afghanistan, since, in case someone in the room didn't notice, Afhganistan has already been liberated. Bush helped save countless Iraqi lives by dethroning Hussein. Do you know what Saddam's favorite form of murdering his own people was? He'd make them chug gasoline, and then shoot them, and flame them. The people in Iraq would be much worse off if not for the war. Sure, Kerry claims to eventually do all these "wonderful" things, yet he doesn't explain HOW he will do it. And in case you Kerry supporters are unable to read summaries, the summary said "Not for Democrats" So why the hell did you read it! Don't wory Xanthexanthias, (Or however you spell it) I got your back
9/28/2004 c1
21Ovaia Pelosa
he thinks the president should have the ABILITY to go to war, but it is wrong for him to do so for whatever reason he chooses. thats pretty straitforward. i also find it hard to believe that kerry hates the soldiers, seeing as how he actually was a soldier (at roughly the same time Bush was a cheerleader, nonetheless.) as for positivity, well, great use of the word "gumption."

he thinks the president should have the ABILITY to go to war, but it is wrong for him to do so for whatever reason he chooses. thats pretty straitforward. i also find it hard to believe that kerry hates the soldiers, seeing as how he actually was a soldier (at roughly the same time Bush was a cheerleader, nonetheless.) as for positivity, well, great use of the word "gumption."
9/26/2004 c1 libyanpoet
I just have one question, and I HOPE you could answer it for me, and if you could and Bush could then I'll support him: WHY did he attack IRAQ (when there was no proof whatsoever of the so-called "weapons of mass destruction") and not Afghanistan? Why did he go after Saddam instead of Bin Laden? Was it for the oil? How does oil compare to (innocent people's) blood?
I just have one question, and I HOPE you could answer it for me, and if you could and Bush could then I'll support him: WHY did he attack IRAQ (when there was no proof whatsoever of the so-called "weapons of mass destruction") and not Afghanistan? Why did he go after Saddam instead of Bin Laden? Was it for the oil? How does oil compare to (innocent people's) blood?
9/26/2004 c1 libyanpoet
I just have one question, and I HOPE you could answer it for me, and if you could and Bush could then I'll support him: WHY did he attack IRAQ (when there was no proof whatsoever of the so-called "weapons of mass destruction") and not Afghanistan? Why did he go after Saddam instead of Bin Laden? Was it for the oil? How does oil compare to (innocent people's) blood?
I just have one question, and I HOPE you could answer it for me, and if you could and Bush could then I'll support him: WHY did he attack IRAQ (when there was no proof whatsoever of the so-called "weapons of mass destruction") and not Afghanistan? Why did he go after Saddam instead of Bin Laden? Was it for the oil? How does oil compare to (innocent people's) blood?
9/26/2004 c1
33Kur'denras
I'd rather have a president who flip-flops back and forth from one side of an issue to the other than a president who is resolutely, immovably, on the wrong side of most issues.

I'd rather have a president who flip-flops back and forth from one side of an issue to the other than a president who is resolutely, immovably, on the wrong side of most issues.