p class="Body" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; line-height: 32px; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; border: none;" interests varies in terms of North Koreas nuclear technology. there was a question of how it would be used and who it would be used on by the United states. Clearly a self defense one from the United states point of view. getting at the US or their allies was a huge concern. Also selling it off to the middle east or other countries was another one. It is a matter of self-defense. Also it is a big concern that North Korea doesn't take south korea by storm who they regularly compete with in other realms such as jamming their radio waves and is regularly aggressive toards. South Korea is an ally to the United states./p
p class="Body" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; line-height: 32px; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; border: none;" for the north Koreans it's a matter of power. Also everyone has a stock pile of them, so why couldn't they? Some of it used to be spent on demonstrating their might and in another sense self defense. For instance they fired a few tests. It was to test it, but more importantly it seemed as if north korea wanted to show they had power too./p
p class="Body" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; line-height: 32px; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; border: none;" I think leadership has a lot to do with these interests and the negotiations that goes on. I saw a timeline of events at some point and over many years they tried to hammer out a compromise which North korea eventually broke and defected from. then the united states complied for a little before it realized that north korea had broken it and terminated the agreement. that seems to be the biggest factor. but some of the leaderships party has had different opinions on the matter and have tried to influence the leaders of these parties who have then carried out their decisions./p
p class="Body" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; line-height: 32px; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; border: none;" I think in many ways they try to go for the compromising type of quadrant and then they have failed and whent in to the one that has them both defecting because one defects first and the other decides that because one has defected maybe it's better to defect too. and then they try again. in some cases North Korea has gotten what it wants by defecting first. I think they try a coordinating type of deal but it doesn't usually last, because North korea doesn't always cooperate and can become secretive and defect. So the outcome is often failure or displeasure of the United States. Deals never seem to work out, NOrth korea is being barely under the radar. Because of a lack of cooperation I think failure occurs more often then not./p